<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Des crochets pour tous[]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.abstractmachine.net/blog/des-crochets-pour-tous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.abstractmachine.net/blog/des-crochets-pour-tous/</link>
	<description>www.abstractmachine.net is a code&#124;art project initiated by Douglas Edric Stanley. It explores the relationships between algorithms and art.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mc</title>
		<link>http://www.abstractmachine.net/blog/des-crochets-pour-tous/#comment-40503</link>
		<dc:creator>mc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abstractmachine.net/blog/des-crochets-pour-tous/#comment-40503</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;oh, yes, of course processing's IDE is simple and nice
but what is this comparing to the new feature of its editor in 125 BETA on linux when it not only properly handles the brackets, but also adds nice feature to ctrl+s when this not only saves the sketch, but adds a nice letter 's' to the edited code as well ?! hmm ..?
of course i should maybe fill a bugreport or something, but.. uhm.. i'm just lazy ../
but the point still is: why for heaven's sake not to reuse some code when thing like coding editor and problems concerned with this have been written and solved thousands times before ?
i agree with coloring and indentation, but &lt;em&gt;at least&lt;/em&gt; the common basics might work. am i asking too much ?
i am sure working with p55 would be much nicer for me and for lot of people also..
mc&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, yes, of course processing&#8217;s IDE is simple and nice
but what is this comparing to the new feature of its editor in 125 BETA on linux when it not only properly handles the brackets, but also adds nice feature to ctrl+s when this not only saves the sketch, but adds a nice letter &#8217;s&#8217; to the edited code as well ?! hmm ..?
of course i should maybe fill a bugreport or something, but.. uhm.. i&#8217;m just lazy ../
but the point still is: why for heaven&#8217;s sake not to reuse some code when thing like coding editor and problems concerned with this have been written and solved thousands times before ?
i agree with coloring and indentation, but <em>at least</em> the common basics might work. am i asking too much ?
i am sure working with p55 would be much nicer for me and for lot of people also..
mc</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Edric Stanley</title>
		<link>http://www.abstractmachine.net/blog/des-crochets-pour-tous/#comment-40110</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Edric Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abstractmachine.net/blog/des-crochets-pour-tous/#comment-40110</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I hear you.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But still, the limits of the editor have long been known, especially by the original creators. At one point they were lamenting having chosen the code they did. I think they rightly chose to focus on the libraries, and not on the editor itself.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Personally I've never really found any code editor all that essential to my work. It just has to work for me. My favorite is BBEdit, because I'm a Mac guy, but I'll also use VI, XCode, that Microsoft thingy (uh, Visual Something), Context, whatever is required. As long as it gives me indentations and color-coding.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I could care less about the features (I actually think the Processing interface is quite brilliant thanks to its simplicity). But I absolutely do want to be able to write brackets ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you.</p>

<p>But still, the limits of the editor have long been known, especially by the original creators. At one point they were lamenting having chosen the code they did. I think they rightly chose to focus on the libraries, and not on the editor itself.</p>

<p>Personally I&#8217;ve never really found any code editor all that essential to my work. It just has to work for me. My favorite is BBEdit, because I&#8217;m a Mac guy, but I&#8217;ll also use VI, XCode, that Microsoft thingy (uh, Visual Something), Context, whatever is required. As long as it gives me indentations and color-coding.</p>

<p>So I could care less about the features (I actually think the Processing interface is quite brilliant thanks to its simplicity). But I absolutely do want to be able to write brackets ;-)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mc</title>
		<link>http://www.abstractmachine.net/blog/des-crochets-pour-tous/#comment-39873</link>
		<dc:creator>mc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abstractmachine.net/blog/des-crochets-pour-tous/#comment-39873</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I just wonder (and &lt;em&gt;creak with my teeth&lt;/em&gt; sometimes) why didn't they reuse some component or already made code for the editor...!?
I mainly miss the Shift+Insert and Ctrl+Insert shortcuts for working with clipboard, but there are other features really missing or not implemented in sketch editor.. (
Namely Scintilla or JEdit or even Eclipse code pops up in my mind when thinking about the P55 editor and there are many others I am sure...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wonder (and <em>creak with my teeth</em> sometimes) why didn&#8217;t they reuse some component or already made code for the editor&#8230;!?
I mainly miss the Shift+Insert and Ctrl+Insert shortcuts for working with clipboard, but there are other features really missing or not implemented in sketch editor.. (
Namely Scintilla or JEdit or even Eclipse code pops up in my mind when thinking about the P55 editor and there are many others I am sure&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Donaldson</title>
		<link>http://www.abstractmachine.net/blog/des-crochets-pour-tous/#comment-39817</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Donaldson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abstractmachine.net/blog/des-crochets-pour-tous/#comment-39817</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Isn't it "Colour"? :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it &#8220;Colour&#8221;? :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
