<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re: Feed me, Feed me!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.abstractmachine.net/blog/re-feed-me-feed-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.abstractmachine.net/blog/re-feed-me-feed-me/</link>
	<description>www.abstractmachine.net is a code&#124;art project initiated by Douglas Edric Stanley. It explores the relationships between algorithms and art.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Etienne Cliquet</title>
		<link>http://www.abstractmachine.net/blog/re-feed-me-feed-me/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Etienne Cliquet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 09:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abstractmachine.net/blog/?p=130#comment-566</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Douglas,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your pingback demonstration ;-) I already knew your blog in fact! I just want to precise some points concerning the original debate about Web 2.0. My critic is not oriented to your posts on CEDAR list nor only to the CEDAR itself but to a general enthusiasm and agreement (fing, fluctuat and more). I wanted to add some more critics in a positive way because i use CMS engine myself and for the website of the art school of Toulouse we're preparing together with 2 collegues. For example, i appreciate the separation form/content that make aesthetic and style something temporary (a kind of carnaval). Finally, i agree that respecting standard protocol is a political position. Criticism is like a training for artist, isnt'it ? ;-) Let's debate again and again ! Well, what a mess to express myself in english !  See you,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Etienne&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Douglas,</p>

<p>Thank you for your pingback demonstration ;-) I already knew your blog in fact! I just want to precise some points concerning the original debate about Web 2.0. My critic is not oriented to your posts on CEDAR list nor only to the CEDAR itself but to a general enthusiasm and agreement (fing, fluctuat and more). I wanted to add some more critics in a positive way because i use CMS engine myself and for the website of the art school of Toulouse we&#8217;re preparing together with 2 collegues. For example, i appreciate the separation form/content that make aesthetic and style something temporary (a kind of carnaval). Finally, i agree that respecting standard protocol is a political position. Criticism is like a training for artist, isnt&#8217;it ? ;-) Let&#8217;s debate again and again ! Well, what a mess to express myself in english !  See you,</p>

<p>Etienne</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
